Fernando Eimbcke

Writer and director Fernando Eimbcke delivers a poignant and subtle coming of age story. The story set in a quiet coastal town tells the story of a teenage boy dealing with the grief of his father's death. Instead of getting explosion of emotions, we see the characters implode with loss of speech. Eimbcke innovates a language and landscape of his own by the telling this story that's loosely based on Vitterio de Sica's The Bicycle Thief. Eimbcke joins the lead of superb filmmakers from Mexico.

Yama Rahimi: Fernando, I heard part of the story was autobiographical. Tell me about how tell me how did you come to the story?
Fernando Eimbcke: This story is autobiographical in some way, but not in another way because the story is about me but also about Paula Markovitch who is the co-writer. Actually she proposed the theme of the film. I was obsessed making a film about a boy looking for something and escaping from something and I went to Paula and she proposed me about making a film about death and I was like no because it's not easy...but she insisted and insisted and we finished the script.

YR: How much of the film is based on the script and how much of it was improvised?
FE: I don't know. I haven't retuned back to the script. We improvised a lot. What I enjoy the most is to take out the dialogue. So we went and said is it possible to communicate without dialogue? If the answer was yes, I said goodbye dialogues. I enjoy that. I like to communicate without words which I think is the most cinematic action.

YR: I quite agree with you because the action off screen is as important as it on screen. I like how the characters implode instead exploding with emotion. How's your perspective on grief? How did you approach it?
FE: Something I learned from Paula is that if you are able to talk about something it's because you processed it. That's why people go to psycho analysis and therapy because they can express. That's why my characters haven't processed. I like that people sometimes can't express themselves.

YR: What was the biggest challenge on this film?
FE: It was myself because I was insecure of the pressure of doing a second film, but fortunately I found the right people and I had a supportive team that helped me.

YR: What's your perspective of teenagers in cinema?
FE: There's a lot of stories about teenagers but it's always the cool stuff which is ok but there's not enough about the other side, the serious stuff. I like teenager films. The old man Don Heber is a teenager in a way.

YR: How did you choose the exotic location?
FE: Actually I wanted an urban location in a big city but my cinematographer said this story has to be set in the tropics where life is everywhere. Even if the characters deal with death, life is going on every where around them. Then we looked at a lot of locations and found the location in Yucatán. We went in the off season which is almost like a ghost town and it was perfect.

Lone Scherfig

Danish director Lone Scherfig (Italian for Beginners) delivers with this smashing coming of age film set in 1960's London about a beautiful and smart teenager who has to choose between an education at Oxford or from life with a charming man twice her age. The film seduces with a lot of charm and humor which is refreshing with a stellar cast that includes Carey Mulligan in a star making performance and the excellent Peter Sarsgaard who finally gets his due with a perfect role as the leading man. Beautifully written by novelist Nick Hornby (High Fidelity, About A Boy) and executed by Sherfig and her impeccable cast and crew.

Yama Rahimi: This film is a far cry from the Dogme days, isn't it?
Lone Scherfig: (Laughs) It really is. Well it does have moments of that feel but it's totally different job and approach. What they have in common is the authenticity of the characters.

YR: How did An Education come about? How did you get involved?
LS: Nick Hornby read this 10-page memoir by Lynn Barber about her youth in London. He told his wife who's a producer to option it which she did. Then they tried to look for writers to adapt it when she suggested that he should do it which he did. After a couple of drafts I got involved and we got the funding. Peter Sarsgaard was already attached when I started.

YR: Were you the first choice as the director?
LS: No I was not. There was another director who left the project because she had a film of her own that got financed which gave me the possibility.

YR: This is a film that could have easily misfired with the wrong acting elements. I liked the story, but its the cast that were pivotal in making this work...could you tell me about how they were assembled.
LS: Well as I mentioned Peter was already hired which wasn't my idea but he was one of the reasons I took on the project. He's brilliant and gave such a nuanced performance with a vulnerability that was beyond a used car salesman bragging. Also a borderline psychopath that you understand and like which is tremendous. Emma Thompson was already also very early on attached. Because of the heavyweights, we got an amazing cast which has been said to be the best cast since Gosford Park. For me it was fantastic to work with actor of that level because it made my work easier. Carey Mulligan was found by our casting director. We looked at a lot of girls but I had a good idea of who Jenny should be. Carey was the best from the beginning who went to a lot of meetings because everybody wanted to make sure we had the right person because as you said, the film is very dependent on the cast. Carey is a fantastic girl who deserves all the praise she gets.

YR: Absolutely. Even Peter Sarsgaard who's always consistently good finally found a perfect role that establishes him as a leading man. Nobody expected him to be in a British period film.
LS: That's right. His accent is really good and it chance for him to have a role where his complex nature and warmth shines through. If you look at his body of work which is so different from one to another. I admire him and he deserved a film that's his.

YR: Yes, I totally agree. It was a difficult role and pulls it off brilliantly. I really loved the casting. Even the Dominic Cooper and Rosamund Pike were perfect and delivered their best performances.
LS: I like to cast against type. Rosamund is usually perceived as an ice queen that you wouldn't associate with comedy. Dominic was known only for History Boys at the time of casting. What I enjoy is to have actors do something they haven't done before and there's some in this film.

YR: I also loved Alfred Molina. It's not that the actors are bad but sometimes it's hard to find the right parts for them. Everyone in this cast is talented so there's no doubt about it. But they all have done work that wasn't the right fit for them.
LS: Also to adjust the part for the actors so that nobody else could have played it but them. It's not forcing the actors to fit into your dreams but also approaching their talent to fit in them. In the case of Alfred, he knew that world well and knew a lot of characters like that from his childhood that were like that that he could tap into.

YR: Even Cara Seymour was great even though she hardly had any dialogue but she didn't get lost in the film. It's a great, almost silent performance.
LS: It was hard because she was in a lot of scenes without any lines. When you read the script, she's in the scenes but she's not doing anything she's just there. It's because the mother commits sins of omission and that you can't see isn't cinematic.

YR: Exactly. Were you or she concerned about not having enough lines of dialogue?
LS: Of course, but she was the only method actor in the film and they all came from different backgrounds. So she got into the character of that era and it was no problem for her. There was enough substance for an actor like Cara Seymour to create a character and she loved it.

YR: Even Olivia Williams was great who was also playing against type in a small but crucial role.
LS: She was made off and the only character not in the original piece. I think Nick Hornby has something personal for Miss Stubbs. He's a former school teacher and has helped some students. Sometimes a good school teacher can make a difference and that's what Nick wanted to say.

YR: What are the more obvious differences between working on this film and perhaps some of your work in Denmark?
LS: You have more artistic liberty in Denmark but also a smaller audience. It's more auteur oriented and the films I made in Denmark I have written or co-written them. In this case it was different because it's less personal and also I had language handicapped. On the other hand because they hired someone non-British, it gave it some edgier element. Even though it's the least edgy thing I have done but the subject matter, however, is controversial which is good.

YR: Was the film funded in Britain only or also Hollywood?
LS: A little bit of BBC money and the rest from Hollywood.

YR: Are you still in touch with your Dogme colleagues?
LS: Yes we are in touch but I travel a lot but if we are all there we are all in the same studio like journalist where we talk and discuss films. The deal in these interviews is that I talk but I rather listen.

YR: Would you do another one or do you think it was a nice experiment while it lasted. With over 200 plus Dogme projects, how do you see it now?
LS: Well I think it has values and some of the films are good films that are original and some directors developed their voices through that. If I had the right script, I definitely would do another film but it's not where I want to go next. I want to do something different and move into something not as sweet but more darker.

YR: What are you working on next?
LS: I worked on a project for another director which is convenient because I can travel and work. Then I have a projects of my own but not sure which one gets financed. I'm also reading tons of scripts here which allows me to get to know Americans and their worries and how they approach problems but so far nothing that makes want to spend two years of my life on.

YR: Well it's good to be cautious because very few European directors make a successful transition to Hollywood cause it's a system where if you don't know what to stand for, you could fall for anything.
LS: I don't know if I'm strong enough for that system. My advantages as a director is my sensitivity which might not work well in that system. I don't know. I think besides having the talent, you need to have the strategy. This film had Hollywood money and they were very protective and supportive.

YR: What's your favorite film or films?
LS: Right now it's The White Ribbon and I can't stop thinking about it. I loved it. I was in Paris when I was young so a saw a lot of the films that Jenny would watch in the film. Also a lot of Italian neo-realism films which inspired me to write "Italian for Beginners".